Page 33 - Here and Now – Apr 2024
P. 33

Power Matters in Quest of ‘Being’ - Dealing with Power and Differences in

                Group work

                                           Power Matters in Quest of Being

                                                       This paper is based on my reflections  with regard to
                                                       human process laboratories held by the Indian Society

                                                      for Applied Behavioural Sciences (ISABS) where I have
                                                     been a professional member for over 40 years. I also held
                                                    several roles in its governance over the years. The paper
                                                   offers  a glimpse of my cumulative insights on the above.
                                                  The need for power comes from a desire to feel important.
                                                 My research into ’power need’ in human process facilitation
                                                 has led to interesting hypotheses. Power dynamics come from
                                                the roles one is expected to fulfil and can manifest in various
                forms                          including resentment, aggression, submission, and avoidance of
                those  in  authority.         Handling  of  ‘power  play  and  its  chemistry  ’  in  group  work

                requires  skills  of  diagnosis,  debate,  and  self-discovery. This  paper  dwells  on  related  issues
                presenting  hypotheses below.

                Triggers of ‘PowerPoint’ in Group Behaviour:  Hypotheses

                I believe everyone has inner ‘power points’ that get triggered during group work, manifesting
                in various forms. A central trigger point is ego-centrism of the role holder, the group facilitator.
                When confronted with a contrary   view in the group, many facilitators make repeated attempts
                to  reiterate  their  own  viewpoint.    This  may  lead  to  conflicts  arising  due  to  undiagnosed

                undercurrents  of  power,  resulting  in  unresolved  differences,  climate  disorientation,  blocks,
                pairing and sub-groups. The following may explain the trigger points of ‘power play’ in group.

                Hypothesis One: The greater the frequency and multiplicity of demands placed by a facilitator
                with invisible shades of power, the greater the group breeds ambivalence of the task and its
                purpose,of building unstated resentment and reluctance to unfolding.

                Trainers share their expectations and assumptions about the group. This tends to put demands
                on the  group, which then evolves through trial and error. When those in a position of power
                and authority correct or question the group, it can propel new power dynamics and feelings. A
                facilitator’s  role  is  to  uncover  the  feelings  and  transform  defensiveness  into  expression.  If

                members  feel  their  needs  are  not being  met  in  the  group,  and  that  the  facilitator  is using
                authority, it can lead to frustration, discord, and withdrawal. If role holders feel they are not




                 pg. 32
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38