Preamble,
Scope and Coverage
ISABS ethics framework is as the title suggests a framework
or a set of guidelines to safeguard the integrity of professional members and
therefore of participants of ISABS programs. It is not a rigid or absolute set
of rules but an ongoing process of search and review emerging out of our values
and our accumulating experience. We would like to emphasize that this process
is never "completed" and that it is one of constant dialoguing, self
search and meaning making simultaneously at the level of the individual and the
institution.
We are also aware that the gap/ discrepancy between what
"is" and what is "ideal" exists. To that end, the ethics
framework is a statement not just of where we would like to reach but of belief
in the process of institution building that this gap will never close, that
what we define collectively as ideal at any one stage is not static but also
evolving, and that is the
strength of the institution.
At the same time, almost paradoxically, to achieve common
tasks, promote professionalism and excellence, we need to have common values,
and design structures and processes to contribute to these. The framework of
ethics would be a baseline document to arrive at greater clarity on the above.
Understanding and internalising the spirit of this framework
is perhaps most important because only then will it translate in living ways
into structures, systems, and processes in our programs and services,
professional development and our vision for the future.
A. Meeting Program Objectives
Ethics Statement#1
Professional Members are aware of the objectives of the
programme and have common agreement about the broad design of the programme.
Professional Members make reasonable effort to determine
whether the programme has accomplished its intended objectives and has not had
undesired consequences for participants.
Ethics Statement #2
When describing a program to prospective participants,
professional members will candidly explain its goals, risks, limitations and
anticipated outcomes, consistent with published descriptions of that particular
program.
When implementing a program, professional members will
faithfully adhere to the description of the program as advertised. Professional members will not knowingly
deviate from the published program description without both a clearly defined
rationale based on the learning goals of the participants and the informed
consent of the participants to any proposed change.
B. Verifying the Impact of Programs
Ethics Statement #3
Professional members will make all reasonable
efforts to determine whether their programs have accomplished their announced
goals, and to determine whether their programs have had unintended or undesired
consequences for participants.
Professional members will do whatever is professionally
possible and ethically appropriate to remedy the effects of any undesired
consequences, and will not attempt to cover up any undesired consequences of
their programs.
Professional Members will actively solicit and respond with
an open mind to feedback regarding their work; and seriously examine program
designs and their own professional skills for ways to improve.
C. Managing Role Boundaries
Ethic Statement #4
Professional members are sensitive to possibilities and data
that the professional or personal relationship that they as facilitator have
with a participant outside of the lab/programme does not affect the nature of
work inside the lab/programme. As far as possible, facilitators avoid working
in labs where they have close personal/professional relationship with any
participant.
D. Avoiding Abuse of Professional Role
Ethic Statement #5
Professional Members are aware that their role in the lab is
to work on programme objectives and not to satisfy their own needs. Professional
Members are expected to be aware of their own needs and use spaces such as
clinicing sessions or peer meetings to resolve their needs and dilemmas.
Ethic Statement #6
Professional Members keep in mind the theoretical base for
the possible consequences of their interventions especially when introducing
innovations, or experimenting with new approaches. They use clinicing and staff
meetings to plan as well as review the impact and consequences of such
interventions.
Ethic Statement#7
The role played by Professional Members (for e.g. As
facilitator, mentor, regional and national institutional roles) are recognised
as powerful roles providing them with an unusual opportunity to exercise power
for the purpose of assisting others to grow and learn about themselves.
Professional Members are expected to be constantly vigilant that this power is
used at all times to promote the growth and enhance the dignity of the
participants.
Ethic Statement #8
The review of participants Membership in the group, readiness
to move on in the Professional Development program is based on agreed upon
criteria with abundant caution that this is not coloured by past experiences,
past
data, personal biases, or personal gain.
Ethic Statement #9
Professional Members do not engage in erotic or sexual
contact with participants. (The boundaries of the programme may be expanded /
defined depending upon whether the Professional Member is a Human Process Lab
Facilitator, in a mentor - PDP participant relationship, or a facilitator in an
extended Professional Development Programme.
E: Personal Autonomy and Confidentiality
Ethic Statement # 10
Professional Members are aware of the pressures on
participants to divulge information in-groups and to succumb to group norms
that transgress on personal autonomy, personal authority, and autonomy of
choices. Professional Members are sensitive to possibilities of the facilitated
colluding with group members in such situations.
Ethic Statement # 11
The individuals' identity and group data is shared in
absolute trust and is not divulged outside the group by Professional Members in
situations not professionally relevant to the lab or outside. (For e.g. other
than clinicing meetings or mentorship meetings, if required).
Professional Members communicate to participants the ISABS
value in this regard.
F. Conflict of Interest
Ethic Statement # 12
ISABS is a voluntary professional society, which is built
from investment and commitment of its members. Professional Members are therefore
expected to be keenly sensitive to possible conflicts or interest when offering
or participating in programs similar or identical to those offered by ISABS.
During ISABS programmes / events, Professional Members are
aware of their role as ISABS professionals, and do not canvass for programmes /
services not related to ISABS.
Ethic Statement # 13
Professional Members commit themselves to nurture the growth
of ISABS and do not detract from ISABS effort to achieve its goals.
G. Competence and Continuous
Development
Ethic Statement #14
Professional member are expected to know the limits of their
competence, and to adhere to those limits when accepting program
responsibilities.
Ethic Statement #15
Professional Members invite and are open to feedback from
peers about the programme / lab and their skills.
In case of extreme personal stress/trauma Professional
Members seek professional help/counseling to assess their own preparedness for
facilitator/mentor roles vis-à-vis own needs and priorities.
Ethic Statement # 16
Professional Members make ongoing efforts to update, renew,
review, and rebuild their competencies, be open to learning and alive to new
life experience theoretical, personal, and professional.
ISABS as an institution continually offers opportunities for
ongoing personal and professional development review at Regional and National
Programs.
H. Sensitivity to Diversity Issues
Ethic Statement # 17
Professional Members are sensitive to and bring to
awareness, instances whenever there are affronts to the dignity of regional,
racial and religious sentiments and discriminations on the basis of gender,
class, caste, colour, language etc.
I.
Voluntary Participation
Ethic Statement # l 8
Given the nature of its programmes, ISABS makes reasonable
efforts to ensure that participants have information about the objectives and
methodology of these programmes, the desirability of voluntary participation
and that sponsoring organizations are aware of the need for voluntary
participation by individuals. ISABS emphasizes this in written
materials like brochures, nomination forms etc.
ISABS also emphasises that programmes are meant to be
learning experiences and are not intended as substitutes for therapy,
psychiatric counseling or personal assessment. ISABS gives reasonable caution
about the consequences these programmes can have for people who require
psychiatric counseling or have serious health problems.
J. Adherence to Law
Ethic Statement # 19
Professional Members abide by local and state laws that
apply to the delivery of ISABS services and use of host facilities. The Dean of each event is responsible for
knowing and communicating applicable regulations (e.g. consuming alcohol,
financial obligations, use of hotel services etc.)